Nebraska approves Keystone pipeline
Market watch top headlines
NEW YORK, Jan 22 AFP
January 23 2013, 1:13PM
The controversial Keystone XL oil pipeline has cleared a key hurdle after the governor of the US state of Nebraska approved a new route that avoids an environmentally sensitive area.
But the fate of the proposed $US7 billion ($A6.66 billion) Canada-to-Texas pipeline, which many environmentalists fear could be damaging, still awaits a determination by the US State Department.
That process comes just a day after President Barack Obama's inaugural address pledge to pursue aggressive climate change mitigation policies in his second term.
The State Department said there would be no final decision on the pipeline before the end of the first quarter of 2013, which ends March 31.
The Canadian government welcomed Nebraska Governor Dave Heineman's "positive decision" on Tuesday to permit routing the pipeline through his state, pointing to the "thousands" of jobs the project is expected to create.
"Our desire is to work with the Obama administration in achieving final approval," Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver said in a statement.
"We believe Keystone XL will enhance the future economic prosperity and security of both Canada and the United States."
Alberta Premier Alison Redford, whose oil-producing province hosts the start of the proposed route, said "we respect and understand that approval of the pipeline is a US domestic matter and that this is just one step in the process that will ultimately be decided by the president".
Obama denied approval for the pipeline last year citing environmental concerns, in part because of criticism in Nebraska.
Critics in the state objected to an initial plan whereby the Keystone pipeline would have traversed the Sand Hills area of Nebraska, which includes a high concentration of sensitive wetlands and extensive areas of shallow groundwater.
The revised pipeline route avoids Sand Hills, but still traverses the High Plains Aquifer. Any impact from an oil spill would be "localised" and Keystone's operator TransCanada would be responsible for any cleanup, according to the Nebraska review.
Heineman, a Republican, noted in a letter to Obama that construction of the pipeline would bring his state $US418.1 million in economic benefits and result in $US11 million to $US13 million a year in additional property taxes.
The pipeline operator will also be responsible for taking out $US200 million in liability insurance to cover its financial responsibilities in case of a spill, Heineman noted.
"Construction and operation of the proposed Keystone XL pipeline, with the mitigations and commitments from Keystone, would have minimal environmental impacts on Nebraska," Heineman wrote.
While the newly revised project puts to rest Nebraska's concerns, environmentalists continue to attack the project because the oil in question is known as a heavy, carbon-intensive fuel that boosts emissions of the gases that cause global warming.
Republican House Speaker John Boehner urged Obama to approve Keystone and not "delay this project any further".
"I recognise all the political pressure the president faces, but with our energy security at stake and many jobs in limbo, he should find a way to say yes," Boehner said.
By John Biers